1. The bills can always stand on their own to explain what was done.
2. The size of the law firm is a factor to be considered when setting hourly rates.
3. It is hardly worth the trouble to use a chart on a fee application.
4. Relevant rates are those charged in the area where the trial court is located.
5. The number of hours your opponent billed is not important.
6. The amount of the damages awarded is important.
7. The opponent to a fee application has the burden of proving the correct market rates.
8. Requesting too high or too low an hourly rate is often focus of the hearing on an application for fees.
9. The "prevailing market rate" is whatever you usually charge.
10. A court may award fees based on whether time was reasonably spent.
11. Handwritten time records are useful exhibits.
12. There is no risk in asking for whatever amount you want to ask for.
13. The applicant must carry the burden of proof on a fee application.
14. Bills do not need to be specific because there is a trusting relationship.
15. It is sometimes possible to make a successful fee request with minimal documentation.
16. It is crucial to demonstrate all the factors in California Rules of Professional Conduct 4-200.
17. Courts are bound by the amount of a contingency fee contract.
18. Some courts require that fees be "reasonably spent."
19. Both the requestor and the opposition should quantify the amounts of "reasonable fees."
20. A court can reduce or deny the amount requested for fees.