For reprint rights or to purchase a copy of your Daily Journal photo, email Jeremy_Ellis@dailyjournal.com for prices or call 213-229-5424.

To buy more copies, call 866-531-1492 or email subscribe@dailyjournal.com
This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...
Daily appellate reports
Enewsletter Sign-up
    Filter by date
     to 
    Search by Case Name
    Search by Judge
    Search by Case Number
    Search by DJ Citation Number
    Search by Category
    Search by Court
Name Category Published
Cifuentes-Caycedo v. United States
Order 		Mar. 20, 2005
Rice v. United States
Order 		Mar. 20, 2005
Berwick v. United States
Order 		Mar. 20, 2005
Lizarraga-Orduno v. United States
Order 		Mar. 20, 2005
Stokes v. United States
Order 		Mar. 20, 2005
Satterfield v. United States
Order 		Mar. 20, 2005
hanna v. United States
Order 		Mar. 20, 2005
Gutierrez-Aguiniga v. United States
Order 		Mar. 20, 2005
Weaks v. United States
Order 		Mar. 20, 2005
McTizic v. United States
Order 		Mar. 20, 2005
Padilla v. United States
Order 		Mar. 20, 2005
Qualchoice v. Rowland
Order 		Mar. 20, 2005
Carrillo-Banuelos v. United States
Order 		Mar. 20, 2005
Giglio v. United States
Order 		Mar. 20, 2005
Motley v. Parks
Order 		Mar. 20, 2005
South Carolina v. Von Dohlen
Order 		Mar. 20, 2005
Reed v. Arizona
Order 		Mar. 20, 2005
Rossi v. Motion Picture Association of America Inc.
Motion picture trade association had 'good faith belief' that website was illegally infringing on copyrights. 		Intellectual Property Mar. 18, 2005
People v. Durazo
Traffic stop and search are unreasonable when based solely on officer's hunch that occupants were involved in criminal activity. 		Criminal Law and Procedure Mar. 18, 2005
California School Employees Association v. Governing Board of the South Orange County Community College District
Substitute community college employees who work more than 75 percent of year are entitled to classified status. 		Education Mar. 18, 2005
Bockting v. Bayer
Admission of child abuse victim's statement to detective without cross-examination at trial was not harmless error. 		Criminal Law and Procedure Mar. 18, 2005
Smith v. Massachusetts
Trial judge may not reconsider count after facially unqualified mid-trial dismissal if availability of reconsideration is not already established. 		Criminal Law and Procedure Mar. 18, 2005
People v. Rucker
Evidence of prior domestic violence incident was admissible against defendant who shot ex-boyfriend. 		Criminal Law and Procedure Mar. 17, 2005
Marriage of Wilcox
Family Code does not subject money judgments to 10-year time limit for renewals. 		Family Law Mar. 17, 2005
People v. Thomas
Appeal after no contest plea must be dismissed where defendant failed to secure probable cause certificate. 		Criminal Law and Procedure Mar. 17, 2005
Opinion of Lockyer
School districts cannot require parental consent or notification when students leave campus to receive confidential medical services. 		Education Mar. 17, 2005
Uniwill LP v. City of Los Angeles
Company that was prevented from constructing shopping center until it granted utility easement may sue for inverse condemnation. 		Real Property Mar. 17, 2005
People v. Dial
Defendant awaiting sentencing in California in other state is not entitled to be returned to California for sentencing. 		Constitutional Law Mar. 17, 2005
People v. Marlin
Defendant who pled no contest to murder cannot raise issues regarding his guilt or innocence on appeal. 		Criminal Law and Procedure Mar. 17, 2005
Dream Theater Inc. v. Dream Theater
Incorporation of arbitration rules into agreement indicates clear intent to have arbitrator decide whether dispute is subject to arbitration. 		Contracts Mar. 17, 2005
By using our website, you agree to our use of cookies in accordance with our cookie policy. You can learn more about how we use cookies by reviewing our Privacy Policy here.