For reprint rights or to purchase a copy of your Daily Journal photo, email Jeremy_Ellis@dailyjournal.com for prices or call 213-229-5424.

To buy more copies, call 866-531-1492 or email subscribe@dailyjournal.com
This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...
Daily appellate reports
Enewsletter Sign-up
    Filter by date
     to 
    Search by Case Name
    Search by Judge
    Search by Case Number
    Search by DJ Citation Number
    Search by Category
    Search by Court

Name Category Published
U.S. v. Alvarez
Drug conviction is vacated to determine whether information was improperly withheld from defense. 		Criminal Law and Procedure May 18, 2004
PowerAgent Inc. v. Electronic Data Systems Corp.
Plaintiff is bound by arbitrators' decision after it argued for arbitration of all claims. 		Civil Procedure May 18, 2004
U.S. v. Keesee
Defendant who hid firearm in safe is subject to enhancement provision of Armed Career Criminal Act. 		Criminal Law and Procedure May 18, 2004
U.S. v. Gomez
Wiretap application adequately explained that traditional techniques, including use of confidential informants, would not meet goals of investigation. 		Criminal Law and Procedure May 18, 2004
SOOS v. C.A. 2/4 (Bachani)
Order 		May 18, 2004
U.S. v. Reyes
Order 		May 18, 2004
Smith v. Pacific Properties and Development Corp.
Disabled 'tester' and organization he represented both had standing to bring lawsuit against property owner for violating discrimination laws. 		Civil Procedure May 18, 2004
Dunmore v. United States
Bankruptcy court abused its discretion in dismissing plaintiff's tax refund claims because it incorrectly categorized them as core proceedings. 		Bankruptcy May 18, 2004
Halaim v. INS
Petitioners' failure to establish their eligibility for asylum is supported by substantial evidence. 		Immigration May 18, 2004
Liliana S., a Minor
Continued placement of children with non-Indian grandmother did not violate Indian Child Welfare Act. 		Family Law May 18, 2004
U.S. v. Rodriguez-Gonzales
Defendant receives lighter sentence for illegal entry due to government's failure to plead subsequent entry. 		Criminal Law and Procedure May 18, 2004
Allstate Insurance Co. v. Hughes
Amended opinion 		May 18, 2004
Ralphs Grocery Co. v. Massie
May 18, 2004
Opinion of Lockyer
State and counties are responsible for paying for reports and exams of defendants in civil and criminal proceedings. 		Government May 17, 2004
Donoghue v. Doherty
Order 		May 17, 2004
Prasertphong v. Arizona
Order 		May 17, 2004
Roper v. Simmons
Order 		May 17, 2004
Florida v. Armstrong
Order 		May 17, 2004
Mason v. American Tobacco Co.
Order 		May 17, 2004
Goughnour v. Cooper
Order 		May 17, 2004
Perry v. United States
Order 		May 17, 2004
Gilbertson v. Albright
Order 		May 17, 2004
Embury v. King
Amended opinion 		May 17, 2004
Tritchler v. County of Lake
Federal court had jurisdiction to review state law claims of employment discrimination after federal claims had been dismissed. 		Civil Procedure May 17, 2004
U.S. v. Iniguez
Order 		May 17, 2004
Padash v. INS
Child Status Protection Act prevents plaintiff from 'aging out' of visa category due to delays in adjudication. 		Immigration May 17, 2004
Silva-Calderon v. Ashcroft
Court does not have jurisdiction to review procedural due process claim that BIA could have competently considered. 		Immigration May 17, 2004
Gerawan Farming Inc. v. Lyons
Order 		May 14, 2004
Haynes v. Farmers Insurance Exchange
Coverage limits contained in insurance provision written in vague language and placed near end of policy may not be enforceable. 		Insurance May 14, 2004
U.S. v. Hickey
Because none of defendant's contentions raise colorable claim under collateral order doctrine, appeals are dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. 		Criminal Law and Procedure May 12, 2004
By using our website, you agree to our use of cookies in accordance with our cookie policy. You can learn more about how we use cookies by reviewing our Privacy Policy here.