This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.

Weekly Quiz

Aug. 2, 2024

Test your knowledge of the Daily Journal's headlines.

1.
1. Federal Judge Philip S. Gutierrez in Los Angeles reversed a $4.7 billion jury verdict that found the National Football League violated antitrust law with its licensing of out-of-market Sunday afternoon football games. Gutierrez said he believed the dollar amount was excessive.
False
2.
2. Howard Jarvis Taxpayers Association sued state officials over ballot language for Proposition 5, which would lower the threshold to pass bonds from a two-thirds vote to just 55%.
False
3.
3. Gov. Gavin Newsom issued an executive order that seeks to revise building codes to ease the production of housing in California.
False
4.
4. A property company accused Sacramento of failing to police vagrancy, leading to damage to its buildings.
False
5.
5. Gerard de Graaf, the European Union’s digital envoy in San Francisco, in an interview with the Daily Journal scoffed at the notion that artificial intelligence is too regulated.
False
6.
6. San Francisco Superior Court’s case clearance rate rose after declining in recent years.
False
7.
7. A federal judge ordered UCLA to put in place policies to stop “Jew Exclusion Zones” set up on campus by anti-war protesters.
False
8.
8. Proposed rules to overhaul the U.S. Supreme Court were hailed by partisans on both sides who said it struck the right balance for maintaining an independent but accountable high court.
False
9.
9. Raza Rasheed from Skadden Arps wrote in an article published in the Daily Journal that the California Supreme Court’s decision in Ramirez v. Charter Communications, Inc., which upheld the validity of discovery limitations in an employment arbitration agreement, would ease enforcement of reasonable arbitration agreements.
False
10.
10. Alexander M. Smith of Jenner & Block wrote in an article published in the Daily Journal that the 9th Circuit clarified its “ambiguity” rule in Whiteside v. Kimberly-Clark Corp.
False