This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...

Judicial Profile

Presiding Justice Laurie Earl has transformed the 3rd District Court of Appeal

Laurie M. Earl
Presiding Justice 3rd District Court of Appeal

ADR Profile

Exceptional Experience

Carmen A. Alberio
ADR Services Inc.

Firm Profile

Homegrown Success

Greenberg Glusker Fields Claman & Machtinger LLP

MCLE

Boating accidents and what you need to know before hitting the water

May 21, 2024

Boating accidents can lead to serious injuries or death, ...

By Reza Torkzadeh, Allen P. Wilkinson

Understanding violence and harassment in the workplace

May 10, 2024

Businesses and workers lose more than $50 billion each ye...

By Francisco Mundaca

The components of effective and defensible workplace investigations

May 9, 2024

Employers should conduct a thorough and fair investigatio...

By Jaya Bajaj

Discipline Report

June 2024

May 7, 2024

May 2024

May 1, 2024

April 2024

Apr. 1, 2024

March 2024

Mar. 1, 2024

February 2024

Feb. 1, 2024

January 2024

Jan. 1, 2024


Webinars

Technology, Law Practice, Ethics/Professional Responsibility

WATCH NOW: Ready to deploy new technologies to simplify your work? Legal tech experts offer guidance in legal prompting and th...


Today's News Weekly Quiz

Labor/Employment, California Supreme Court

The plaintiffs argue that the state Constitution grants the Legislature unlimited power to enforce a workers compensation system, which cannot be removed by ...


Alternative Dispute Resolution

Retired LA County judge joins ADR Services

May 22, 2024
By Douglas Saunders Sr.

Los Angeles County Superior Court Judge Gregory Keosian retired from the bench May 15.


Labor/Employment, Ethics/Professional Responsibility

The public has until July 18 to comment on the new rules, which would make it a violation of California employment regulations if the use of artificial intel...


Torts/Personal Injury

Railyard worker awarded $58M for injured foot

May 22, 2024
By Douglas Saunders Sr.

Alexander R. Wheeler of Parris Law firm represented the worker. He said the defendants rejected a $3 million pre-trial settlement offer.


Columns

Family

Custody should work for everyone

May 22, 2024
By Mary Lou Byrne

Judicial decisions are based on public policy and legal principles, but often lack the time and resources to address the compl...


Constitutional Law, Civil Rights

The Supreme Court's decision means that the State of California cannot rely on qualified immunity to avoid liability for consc...


Technology, Intellectual Property

Commenters fault USPTO rules for providing inadequate guidance to inventors using Generative-AI.



Verdicts & Settlements

False Claims Act People of the State of Cali... $74,250,000
Unlawful Pay Practices Elizabeth Sue Petersen, Mar... $25,000,000
School Incident John Doe 2 v. Santa Barbara... $25,000,000
Unfair Competition Andrea Stevenson v. Allstat... $25,000,000
42 U.S.C. Section 1983 Konnech Inc., Eugene Yu v. ... $5,000,000
Environmental Contamination The People of the State of ... $5,000,000
Dangerous Condition of Public Property Joseph Lopez, Dianna Lopez,... $4,800,000
Breach of Lease KFT Enterprises, No. 1 L.P.... $3,000,000
Wage and Hour Anicia Cisneros, on behalf ... $2,980,000
Wage and Hour Hung Pham, individually and... $2,000,000

On the Move

Dykema

May 20, 2024


Ashley R. Fickel as Managing Member in Los Angeles

Fickel is also a member of the firm's Professional Personnel Committee and is the immediate past leader of the firm's Financial Services Litigation Practice Group, a position he held for the past three years. In his practice, Fickel represents financial institutions, manufacturers, and a diverse group of businesses and individuals in complex legal disputes. He leverages his formidable advocacy skills to defend businesses facing individual and class action claims involving consumer financial services, consumer fraud, real estate, privacy, catastrophic injury, and complex business disputes.


Featured Content


Community News

The San Fernando Valley Bar Association held its Annual Judges' Night on Thursday, May 16 at the Woodland Hills Country Club. Judge Otis D. Wright II received the Legacy of Justice Award, Judge Valerie Salkin received the Inspiration Award and Judge Mitchell Beckloff received the Special Recognition Award. Judge Stephen P. Pfahler was named Judge of the Year



Attorney Profiles


Special Reports

The Resolution Issue 2024

May 1, 2024

Our annual issue devoted to the work of dispute resolution professionals in California.


Daily Appellate Report

Real Property

Doskocz v. ALS Lien Services

Civil Code Section 5655, requiring delinquent assessment payments be applied first to the assessment before collection fees, serves a public purpose and cannot be waived.


Constitutional Law

Ghost Golf, Inc. v. Newsom

Governor Newsom's COVID-19 Blueprint regime did not exceed the legislative authority granted by the Emergency Services Act and was not an improper delegation.


Criminal Law and Procedure

U.S. v. Cloud

Failure of prosecutors to disclose communications between key witness and prosecution regarding her providing testimony in exchange for financial benefits was a violation of the accused's...


Native American Affairs

Stillaguamish Tribe of Indians v. State Washington

A tribe's claim to fish based on the Treaty of Point Elliot's "usual and accustomed grounds" determination can be established using historical evidence, even if it conflicts with other ev...


Prisoners Rights, Constitutional Law

Nielsen v. Thornell

Arizona inmates did not have a protected liberty interest in avoiding private prisons because they did not impose an "atypical or significant hardship" beyond ordinary prison conditions.