This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...

California Supreme Court

Apr. 25, 2024

The meaning of ‘disclosure’ under whistleblower retaliation claims has expanded

The California Supreme Court has expanded the interpretation of “disclose” under California’s whistleblower protection statute, allowing employees to report workplace wrongdoing even if the employer already possesses knowledge of the violation.

Matthew J. Matern

Founding Attorney , Matern Law Group PC

1230 Rosecrans Ave
Manhattan Beach , CA 90266

Phone: (310) 531-1900

Email: mmatern@maternlawgroup.com

Southwestern Univ SOL; Los Angeles CA

Julieta Hernandez

Associate, Matern Law Group PC

Shutterstock

The California Supreme Court has broadened the interpretation of “disclose” under California’s whistleblower protection statute (Labor Code Section 1102.5). On May 22, 2023, in a unanimous decision in the case of People ex re. Garcia-Brower v. Kolla’s, Inc., the Court clarified that a report of unlawful activities made to an employer or agency that already knew about the violation is a protected “disclosure” within the meaning of Section 1...

To continue reading, please subscribe.

Already a subscriber?

Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)