This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...

Law Practice

Mar. 10, 2006

Making Advanced Physics Palatable Cinched Win

SERIOUS D - Choosing to take a bet-the-company patent-infringement defense to a jury is a risky move, given the looming threat of injunction. When your client is a foreign company litigating on U.S. soil, winning becomes even more difficult. When your only chance of survival requires convincing a jury that the plaintiff's extremely complex and highly sophisticated nanotechnology patents are invalid, forget about it.

        Choosing to take a bet-the-company patent-infringement defense to a jury is a risky move, given the looming threat of injunction. When your client is a foreign company litigating on U.S. soil, winning becomes even more difficult. When your only chance of survival requires convincing a jury that the plaintiff's extremely complex and highly sophisticated nanotechnology patents are invalid, forget about it.
   &nb...

To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!

Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)

Already a subscriber?

Enewsletter Sign-up