This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...
2026-08-28

From The Archive


MCLE

The state of college sports: When passion transitions to business

Aug. 21, 2026

With NIL valuations and endorsements influencing every st...

By Frank N. Darras

Is an algorithmic feed 'speech'? Courts are about to decide

Aug. 18, 2026

As courts grapple with whether algorithmically generated ...

By Krista L. Baughman

Bias is implicit in all AI, even legal AI

Aug. 12, 2026

Attorneys who use AI must do so with their eyes wide open...

By Susan L. Greenberg


Today's News

A Riverside judge said appellate precedent may require treating minors held in juvenile facilities as prisoners, potentially immunizing the county from liabi...


Data Privacy


U.S. District Judge Richard Seeborg called the fee request "extraordinary" but warranted after Boies Schiller, Susman Godfrey and Morgan & Morgan secured...


Chief U.S. District Judge Troy L. Nunley said a special master was warranted because of the defendants' conduct, the case's expedited schedule and the Easter...


Antitrust & Trade Reg.


Lawmakers further narrow California antitrust overhaul

Aug. 31, 2026
By Malcolm Maclachlan

New amendments to AB 1776 preserve single-firm antitrust claims while limiting enforcement to the attorney general and district attorneys.


The court ruled that Kalshi's sports event contracts are not swaps protected from state regulation under federal commodities law, splitting with the 3rd Cir...


Technology, Class Action


A child sexual abuse survivor filed suit against artificial intelligence company xAI claiming its Grok chatbot used images from her abuse to generate new sex...


Columns

Civil Procedure

Avoiding two common errors on post-trial motions

Aug. 31, 2026
By Rex S. Heinke

Missed post-trial requirements can doom a challenge to an adverse verdict--and the appeal that follows. Counsel should know tw...


Ethics/Professional Responsibility

Privilege is not a litigation strategy

Aug. 28, 2026
By Andrew A. Servais

Litigation decisions involving attorney-client privileged information can result in waiver, attorney disqualification and othe...


Torts/Personal Injury

The driver is gone. The duty is not.

Aug. 31, 2026
By K. Chike Odiwe

California negligence law already knows how to allocate responsibility when technology replaces the person behind the wheel.



Verdicts & Settlements

Breach of Contract Pomona Valley Hospital Medi... $66,100,000
Proposition 218 tax overcharge Scott Simpson, Dvonne Pitru... $40,854,300
Premises Liability Vanessa Sousa Oliveira v. M... $20,700,000
Unfair Competition The People of the State of ... $15,000,000
Wage and Hour Steve McKinney, Michelle Ly... $12,500,000
Wage and Hour Daniel Gonzalez, John Frye ... $9,500,000
Consumers Legal Remedies Act Lance Dutcher, individually... $7,500,000
Retaliation Adolfo Beltran v. Roe Hospital $6,664,000
Dangerous Condition of Public Property Jennifer Lynn Ryan v. City ... $5,000,000
Product Liability Daniel A. Fung, Jasia Hu v.... $3,682,590

On the Move

Ogletree Deakins

Aug. 27, 2026


Frank Olah joined Ogletree Deakins as a shareholder in Los Angeles. The move was Aug. 24, 2026.

Olah is a labor and employment litigator with more than 20 years of legal experience. His practice focuses on defending employers in single-plaintiff and multi-plaintiff lawsuits; class and representative actions, including Private Attorneys General Act (PAGA) actions; and arbitration proceedings. Olah regularly appears before federal and state courts as well as administrative agencies, handling claims involving wrongful termination, discrimination, harassment, and retaliation, along with matters brought under Title VII, California's Fair Employment and Housing Act (FEHA), the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA), the Age Discrimination in Employment Act (ADEA), the Family and Medical Leave Act (FMLA), and the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA).


Alexander Harwin joined Ogletree Deakins as a shareholder in Los Angeles.

Harwin focuses his practice on all aspects of labor and employment litigation. For more than 20 years, he has represented employers in matters involving discrimination, harassment, defamation, wage-and-hour disputes, contractual obligations, privacy, and more. Harwin partners with employers to navigate complex legal challenges, develop practical strategies, and mitigate risk. When litigation is necessary, he manages all phases of the process, from deposition to pre-trial motions and through arbitration and trial.


Details

Ogletree Deakins has 1100 attorneys in 60 offices including Los Angeles, Orange County, Sacramento, San Diego, San Francisco, Torrance, Fresno . Among the law firm’s key practice areas are Traditional labor and employment, workplace safety, employee benefits, and business immigration. The firm’s website is http://www.ogletree.com/

Address

400 South Hope Street, Suite 1200 , Los Angeles California 90071 United States
T: (404) 260-1493

Featured Content


Community News

Slideshow, Community News


The Los Angeles chapter of the Women's White Collar Defense Association held its annual Summer Soirée at Kaplan Marino PC, bri...




Daily Appellate Report

Arbitration, Consumer Law

Srivastava v. BMW of North America

A vehicle manufacturer expressly authorized to compel arbitration under a lease may enforce the provision as a third-party beneficiary against the lessee's statutory warranty claims.


Commercial Law

Rocky Patel Premium Cigars, Inc. v. Bonta

Premium cigars' exemption from federal premarket review does not preempt California from requiring unflavored-product verification before retail sale.


Constitutional Law

Richards v. Newsom

Penal Code section 26806's requirement that certain firearm dealers maintain digital recording systems on business premises does not constitute a Fourth Amendment search.


Bankruptcy

In re: Patacsil

District court's order affirming bankruptcy court's findings in adversary proceeding regarding dischargeability and remanding for further proceedings was not a final appealable order over...