Labor/Employment
Feb. 11, 2006
'Patten' Warns Employers About Reach of Whistle-Blower Retaliation
Employment Column - By Michelle A. Reinglass - In a case of apparent first impression, the 3rd District Court of Appeal in Patten v. Grant Joint Union High School District, 2005 DJDAR 14587 (Dec. 19), expanded upon the recent decision in Yanowitz v. L'Oreal USA Inc. , 36 Cal.4th 1028 (2005), in applying its standard for evaluating adverse employment action to claims of whistle-blower retaliation.
By Michelle A. Reinglass
In a case of apparent first impression, the 3rd District Court of Appeal in Patten v. Grant Joint Union High School District, 2005 DJDAR 14587 (Dec. 19), expanded upon the recent decision in Yanowitz v. L'Oreal USA Inc...
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!
Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)
Already a subscriber?
Sign In