This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...

Judges and Judiciary

Feb. 11, 2006

Courts Must Nix, Not Interpret, Incomplete Laws

Forum Column - By Dana Cephas - If the California Legislature drafted a statute authorizing Superior Court judges to rewrite the statute of limitations for any law that the judges personally did not like, everyone would agree that such a law violated the separation of powers doctrine. But what if the Legislature was not so blatant in its actions?

        
Forum Column

By Dana Cephas
        
        If the California Legislature drafted a statute authorizing Superior Court judges to rewrite the statute of limitations for any law that the judges personally did not like, everyone would agree that such a law violated the separation of powers...

To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!

Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)

Already a subscriber?

Enewsletter Sign-up