This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...

Entertainment & Sports

May 29, 2002

'Bonusectomy' Fight Is Dog and Pony Show

Column by Garry Abrams - Can a defendant in a Hollywood lawsuit be regarded as less dangerous than an exploding Ford Pinto but still be branded "a lying dog crook"?

        By Garry Abrams
        
        Can a defendant in a Hollywood lawsuit be regarded as less dangerous than an exploding Ford Pinto but still be branded "a lying dog crook"?
        That was the vexing metaphorical question raised last week in the punitive phase of Schapiro v. Morgan ...

To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!

Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)

Already a subscriber?

Enewsletter Sign-up