By Garry Abrams
Can a defendant in a Hollywood lawsuit be regarded as less dangerous than an exploding Ford Pinto but still be branded "a lying dog crook"?
That was the vexing metaphorical question raised last week in the punitive phase of Schapiro v. Morgan ...
Can a defendant in a Hollywood lawsuit be regarded as less dangerous than an exploding Ford Pinto but still be branded "a lying dog crook"?
That was the vexing metaphorical question raised last week in the punitive phase of Schapiro v. Morgan ...
To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!
Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)
Already a subscriber?
Sign In