This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...

Personal Injury & Torts

Aug. 23, 2001

Hyper Critical

A disturbing lawsuit treating a scientific disagreement as an actionable tort will meet a quick, justified end if a recent Southern District of California decision is affirmed. The scientific dispute is over the existence of attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder - the only indicated use of the prescription drug Ritalin (methylphenidate) - as a medical condition.


By James M. Beck
        
        A disturbing lawsuit treating a scientific disagreement as an actionable tort will meet a quick, justified end if a recent Southern District of California decision is affirmed. The scientific dispute is over the existence of attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder - the only indicated use of the prescription drug Ritalin (methylphenidate)...

To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!

Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)

Already a subscriber?

Enewsletter Sign-up