This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...

Judges and Judiciary

Sep. 2, 1998

Lesser-Crime Precedent Flies Out the Window

SAN FRANCISCO - Another precedent established by the Rose Bird court was toppled Monday, as the California Supreme Court ruled that trial judges are no longer obligated to tell jurors that they have the option of convicting a defendant of a related crime that is less serious than the one charged by the prosecution.

By Philip Carrizosa
Daily Journal Senior Writer
        SAN FRANCISCO - Another precedent established by the Rose Bird court was toppled Monday, as the California Supreme Court ruled that trial judges are no longer obligated to tell jurors that they have the option of convicting a defendant of a related crime that is less serious than the one charged by ...

To continue reading, please subscribe.

Already a subscriber?

Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)