This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...

Law Practice

Aug. 3, 2016

A new ground for review and transfer

The Judicial Council should adopt a new Rule of Court to allow the Supreme Court to send a case back to the Court of Appeal if it's shown that the lower appellate court decision was materially erroneous. By Cruz Reynoso and Stephen Greenberg

Cruz Reynoso

See more...

By Cruz Reynoso and Stephen Greenberg

There's an age-old philosophical question, "If a tree falls in a forest and no one is around to hear it, does it make a sound?" It's time to pose an analogous - and much more practical - query: If a California Court of Appeal opinion presents no "important question of law" but arguably relies on a material factual or legal error, or an unbriefed issue, does it make a difference?

Unquestionably it does ...

To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!

Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)

Already a subscriber?

Enewsletter Sign-up