Everybody agrees that over the past two decades family law has become more pluralistic. Pluralism, in the sense I use here, means that the law affords more choice to more types of couples to tailor the financial obligations stemming from their relationships in the way that best suits their relationships. Generally, two developments contributed to this pluralistic progression: one, more institutions for registration of relationships (e.g., civil unions, domestic partnerships); two, more typ...
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!
Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)
Already a subscriber?
Sign In