This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...

California Supreme Court

Feb. 9, 2012

High Court weighs whether gag order on lawyer was harmless error

The state Supreme Court Tuesday seemed ready to apply a harmless-error test to a judge's gag order that prevented a defense lawyer from talking to his client about a key witness statement in an attempted murder case.


By Laura Ernde


Daily Journal Staff Writer


The state Supreme Court on Tuesday seemed ready to apply a harmless-error test to a judge's gag order that prevented a defense lawyer from talking to his client about a key witness statement in an attempted murder case.


Defense lawyer Marc J. Zilversmit pleaded with the justices not to "jump off a cliff and say this is not structural error." The U.S. Supreme Court has held that blanket co...

To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!

Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)

Already a subscriber?

Enewsletter Sign-up