This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...

California Courts of Appeal

Jan. 12, 2012

Judge's criminal sentencing practices rebuffed by appellate panel

A practice that judges routinely use to settle criminal cases was challenged Tuesday by a divided 6th District Court of Appeal .


By Laura Ernde


Daily Journal Staff Writer


A practice that judges routinely use to settle criminal cases was challenged Tuesday by a divided 6th District Court of Appeal.


The majority accused Santa Clara County Superior Court Judge Rene Navarro of engaging in illegal plea-bargaining when he told a burglary defendant he'd be inclined to sentence him to five years in prison if he pleaded guilty to numerous charges, including forgery, grand th...

To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!

Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)

Already a subscriber?

Enewsletter Sign-up