Perspective
Mar. 9, 2010
What Hertz v. Friend Means To Employers
The Supreme Court has finally resolved an inconsistency among federal courts that has been very costly to employers, writes Maria Rodriguez of Winston & Strawn.
By Maria Rodriguez
The U.S. Supreme Court's Feb. 23, 2010 decision in Hertz Corp. v. Friend sends a clear message that our country's highest Court set out to resolve an inconsistency among federal courts that has been very costly to employers on several levels, for too many years. Originally, the idea of diversity removal was to afford defendants whose principal place of business is in another state the opportunity to remove a case filed against it in a different s...For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!
Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)
Already a subscriber?
Sign In