By Kenneth Klein
In criminal trials, our legal system intentionally indulges a higher number of guilty defendants going free in order to minimize the frequency of innocent people going to jail. That is the whole point of a presumption of innocence and requiring proof of guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. This past summer, in a case called Ashcroft v. Iqbal, the U.S. Supreme Court made a similar kind of choice for the civil litigation system. The Court determi...
To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!
Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)
Already a subscriber?
Sign In