This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...

Intellectual Property

Nov. 3, 2006

Court Will Wrestle With Standard for Obviousness in Patent Cases

FOCUS COLUMN - By Jeffrey A. McKinney and Julianne M. Sullivan - 'Obviousness," "motivation to combine," "teaching-suggestion-motivation."


Focus Column

By Jeffrey A. McKinney and Julianne M. Sullivan

     
      'Obviousness," "motivation to combine," "teaching-suggestion-motivation." These are all abstract terms used to determine whether an invention is patentable in the United States; they are the subject of an important Supreme Court case that will be argued this term: Teleflex Inc. v. KSR Int'l, 119 Fed. Appx. 282 (Fe...

To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!

Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)

Already a subscriber?

Enewsletter Sign-up