By L. Amy Blum and Benjamin M. Paik
Although malicious prosecution has long been recognized as a disfavored tort, Sheldon Appel Co. v. Albert & Oliker, 47 Cal.3d 863 (1989), two recent appellate-court decisions have potentially opened the floodgates for malicious-prosecution actions arising from contractual ...
Although malicious prosecution has long been recognized as a disfavored tort, Sheldon Appel Co. v. Albert & Oliker, 47 Cal.3d 863 (1989), two recent appellate-court decisions have potentially opened the floodgates for malicious-prosecution actions arising from contractual ...
To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!
Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)
Already a subscriber?
Sign In