This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...

U.S. Supreme Court

Oct. 22, 2014

High court shirking responsibility in denying certiorari in Sixth Amendment case

Last week's denial of review in a key sentencing case is just the most recent example of the court side-stepping its responsibility to grapple with issues that demand its attention. By Ilya Shapiro


By Ilya Shapiro


While conventional wisdom among U.S. Supreme Court watchers is that the narrowness of many of the justices' recent decisions has created a "faux-nanimity," the court's docket control - its ability to pick and choose which cases to hear - goes even further in explaining why the justices are agreeing at record rates. Last week's denial of review in a key sentencing case - Jones v. United States, on which more anon - is j...

To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!

Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)

Already a subscriber?

Enewsletter Sign-up