The obvious question that first occurs when a strong firm engages in a discussion with a weak firm about a merger is, "why a merger and not a cherry pick?"
The preferred choice usually is to cherry pick. The issue of successor liability to substantial and undiscovered claims, and the expense, time, and complexities with extensive due diligence are significantly reduced or avoided. It is also not unreasonable to have ser...
To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!
Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)
Already a subscriber?
Sign In