This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...
You have to be a subscriber to view this page.

Intellectual Property

Oct. 18, 2014

Arbitration has attractive features in patent disputes, but limits remain

A dispute between two technology companies sheds some light on why arbitration still lags in popularity behind litigation as a method to resolving patent disputes, and might fall further behind in the future.


By Kevin Lee


Daily Journal Staff Writer


Amkor Technology Inc. and Tessera Inc. are undergoing the intellectual property equivalent of an ugly divorce. And it's turned into a battle in federal and state court even though the companies agreed in 1996 to resolve future disputes in arbitration. The dispute sheds some light on why arbitration still lags in popularity behind litigation as a method to resolving patent disputes.


And legal observer...

To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!

Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)

Already a subscriber?

Enewsletter Sign-up