This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...

Intellectual Property

Oct. 15, 2014

Reining in patent trolls, state by state

Over the course of 2014, efforts to crack down on "patent trolls" have dramatically increased. On the federal level, such efforts have had little success; but in states, the situation is markedly different. By David B. Sandelands


By David B. Sandelands


In State of Vermont v. MPHJ Technology Investments LLC, 14-1481 (Fed. Cir., Aug. 11, 2014), the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit held that it lacked jurisdiction to hear a case alleging bad faith patent assertion brought by the state of Vermont against a patent assertion entity, pursuant to the state's consumer protection statute.


Over the course of 2014, efforts to crack down on "patent trolls" ...

To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!

Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)

Already a subscriber?

Enewsletter Sign-up