Prosecutors dream of starting their opening arguments with a discussion of the defendant's criminal history. Second chair associates fantasize about a first chair partner tripping on the courthouse steps, requiring them to save the day with the winning final argument. Government lawyers defending the taxpayer's coffers desperately wish jurors knew the money comes from their taxes.
Lawyers refrain from such tactics because...
To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!
Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)
Already a subscriber?
Sign In