This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...

California Courts of Appeal

Jun. 14, 2012

Attorneys face malicious prosecution claims

The 2nd District Court of Appeal reverses a trial court judge, allowing the claims to proceed.

By John Roemer
Daily Journal Staff Writer

Lawyers who appear on pleadings in an underlying case cannot avoid liability for malicious prosecution merely by showing they took a passive role as standby counsel who would try the case if it went to trial, the 2nd District Court of Appeal held in a ruling last week.

The ruling came after the court reviewed malicious prosecution and defamation claims by a litigant against attorneys in a prior shareholder action involving ...

To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!

Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)

Already a subscriber?

Enewsletter Sign-up