Once again, advances in reproductive technology force us to re-examine concepts we thought we understood.
A few weeks ago, in Astrue v. Capato, the U.S. Supreme Court denied social security benefits to one couple's posthumously conceived offspring, holding that payment was dependent upon the vagaries of state law." While critics of the decision contend that the ruling represents yet another example of atavistic bias on ...
To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!
Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)
Already a subscriber?
Sign In