This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...

Family

Jun. 8, 2012

Posthumous children and Social Security

The Supreme Court recently decided that benefits to posthumously conceived offspring are dependent upon the vagaries of state law. By Ellen Waldman of Thomas Jefferson School of Law


By Ellen Waldman


Once again, advances in reproductive technology force us to re-examine concepts we thought we understood.


A few weeks ago, in Astrue v. Capato, the U.S. Supreme Court denied social security benefits to one couple's posthumously conceived offspring, holding that payment was dependent upon the vagaries of state law." While critics of the decision contend that the ruling represents yet another example of atavistic bias on ...

To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!

Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)

Already a subscriber?

Enewsletter Sign-up