This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...

U.S. Court of Appeals for the 9th Circuit

May 26, 2012

Access versus use: Nosal decision creates circuit split

Nosal created a circuit split regarding the scope of the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act. By Thomas P. O'Brien, Daniel Prince and Katy Wanner of Paul Hastings LLP


By Thomas P. O'Brien, Daniel Prince and Katy Wanner


The U.S. Supreme Court soon may be asked to resolve an apparent circuit split concerning the breadth and scope of the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act (CFAA),, 18 U.S.C. Section 1030, specifically the provision criminalizing "exceeding authorized access." In April, an en banc panel of the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals, in United States v. Nosal, explicitly rejected the 5th, 7th and 1...

To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!

Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)

Already a subscriber?

Enewsletter Sign-up