Justice Arthur Gilbert's enjoyable article, "What's in a Number," published May 7, raised an issue I would like to see him write about in the future: Why the Courts of Appeal issue so many unpublished decisions?
Apparently, the first column Justice Gilbert wrote 24 years ago concerned the depublication of opinions, which rarely happens now.
I practice in a rather specialized area of law, dealing with medical peer review, also know...
To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!
Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)
Already a subscriber?
Sign In