This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...

Litigation & Arbitration,
Alternative Dispute Resolution

May 25, 2012

Statutorily approved arbitration clauses could provide relief

Providing statutorily approved language could help end the flood of challenges to arbitration clauses.

Lawrence Waddington

Neutral, JAMS

Email: waddington1@aol.com

Lawrence is a retired Los Angeles County Superior Court Judge and former assistant attorney general for the state of California. He is author of "Disorder in the Court" at Amazon.com. He also edits the 9th Circuit blog, "The 9th Circuit Watch."

Parties challenging arbitration continue to flood the courts with objections to enforcing the terms of an arbitration clause. Despite comprehensive arbitration clauses written in an attempt to disclose every facet of this alternative to litigation, California courts nevertheless find tenuous grounds for refusing to enforce arbitration. In Mayers v.Volt Mgmt. Corp., 203 Cal. App.4th 1194 (2012), and Samaniego v. Empire Today LLC., 2012 WL 1591 847, the court, citing Civil Code...

To continue reading, please subscribe.

Already a subscriber?

Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)