By Anthony P. Capozzi
No one likes the idea of closed courthouses in California. Not judges, about 80 percent of whom so far have pledged to participate in voluntary salary waivers or make personal donations to their courts. Not court staff, most of whom face forced furloughs with corresponding reductions in income. Not defendants, who may have to wait to be arraigned or released. Not the public, which is already feeling the effects of too many furlough Fridays a...
No one likes the idea of closed courthouses in California. Not judges, about 80 percent of whom so far have pledged to participate in voluntary salary waivers or make personal donations to their courts. Not court staff, most of whom face forced furloughs with corresponding reductions in income. Not defendants, who may have to wait to be arraigned or released. Not the public, which is already feeling the effects of too many furlough Fridays a...
To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!
Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)
Already a subscriber?
Sign In