Labor/Employment
Jul. 17, 2014
Handling discrimination suits by unauthorized workers
A Hobson's choice for employers: terminate an employee known to be unauthorized and face a discrimination suit, or retain the employee in violation of federal immigration law. By Jason A. Geller
The state Supreme Court's decision in Salas v. Sierra Chemical Co., 2014 DJDAR 8334 (June 26, 2014), is a poster child of the Hobson's choice for employers: terminate an employee known to be unauthorized to work in the U.S. and face a potential discrimination suit, or retain the employee in potential violation of federal immigration law. In Salas, the high court considered whether an employee may proceed with a disability ...
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!
Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)
Already a subscriber?
Sign In