This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...

Perspective

Jul. 26, 2011

Pro-institution movement: America's dwindling access to the federal courts

The current U.S. Supreme Court takes on a skeptical view that individual rights should be vindicated in federal courts. By Daniel Purcell of Keker & Van Nest LLP


By Daniel Purcell


Every litigator knows cases are won just as often on procedural issues as on the merits. Because procedural rules and standards govern who has a right to sue and what courts have the power to hear claims, plaintiffs and defendants have always used procedure to their advantage whenever possible. Likewise, American legal history is full of overt and covert efforts by lawmakers - both legislative and judicial - to alter procedural standards to rest...

To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!

Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)

Already a subscriber?

Enewsletter Sign-up