Ethics/Professional Responsibility
Jul. 16, 2011
You read what? The continuing perils of inadvertent disclosure, privilege and disqualification
California receives more guidance in the area of attorney-client privilege and inadvertent disclosure. By Wendy L. Patrick of the San Diego district attorney's office
In the recent case of Clark v. Superior Court 196 Cal.App.4th 37 (June 2, 2011), California receives more guidance in the area of attorney-client privilege and inadvertent disclosure. Grant Clark sued his former employer VeriSign, after his position as VeriSign's chief administrative officer was eliminated. In connection with the litigation, Clark gave his attorneys numerous documents that VeriSign alleged were protected by the atto...
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!
Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)
Already a subscriber?
Sign In