This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...

Labor/Employment

Jul. 14, 2011

Rise of the suitable seating suit: A new trend in employment class actions

Claims that employers are not providing suitable seating are on the rise across a broad spectrum of industries. By Shawn Khorrami and Katie McSweeney of Khorrami Pollard & Abir LLP


By Shawn Khorrami and Katie McSweeney


Have you ever found yourself thinking about how much your feet hurt after a few hours of walking around a shopping mall? Now imagine how you might feel if you were forced to regularly spend eight hours at a time on your feet. That is the situation giving rise to a new wave of unique class action litigation.


The first of the so-called "suitable seating" actions, Bright v. 99¢ Only Stores, was fi...

To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!

Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)

Already a subscriber?

Enewsletter Sign-up