This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...

Labor/Employment

Jul. 14, 2011

In defense of the common law duty of loyalty

When non-fiduciary employees are disloyal, the common law duty of loyalty may no longer protect employers. By Bradford K. Newman and Kyle Reykalin of Paul, Hastings, Janofsky & Walker LLP


By Bradford K. Newman and Kyle Reykalin


For good reason, employers have long considered axiomatic the fact that every one of their employees owe them an undivided duty of loyalty. Until recently, California state courts have done the same. However, a disturbing trend in the federal courts, which in turn is spawning a slew of demurrer practice in state court, makes clear that employers can no longer take for granted its non-fiduciary employees' common law obli...

To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!

Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)

Already a subscriber?

Enewsletter Sign-up