LETTERS TO THE EDITOR COLUMN
The key weakness in Professor Jonathan H. Alder's polemic is what he readily admits - all the "evidence" for the disaster he claims to be describing is derived from anecdotal accounts. ("An Unintended Consequence of the Endangered Species Act," July 1). Whether there are many or but a few such accounts, they are anecdotal, not valid scientific evidence. The key shortcoming of the Endangered Species Act ...
To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!
Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)
Already a subscriber?
Sign In