This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...
You have to be a subscriber to view this page.

Perspective

Jul. 1, 2011

Why San Francisco’s Proposed Circumcision Ban Violates the First Amendment

How the 14th Amendment's protection of parental right may impact attempts to ban circumcision. By Michael A. Helfand of Pepperdine University School of Law


By Michael A. Helfand


On one level, there is something almost comical about the current controversy over the proposed ballot initiative in San Francisco to ban circumcision. Newspapers capitalizing on the debate abound, with headlines reading "California Wants to Snip Male Circumcision in the Bud" and "Male Circumcision: On the Chopping Block?"


But the proposed ban on circumcision is - forgive the pun - painfully s...

To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!

Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)

Already a subscriber?

Enewsletter Sign-up