This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...

Constitutional Law

Feb. 25, 2017

Let's amend Constitution to prohibit lame-duck pardons

One of the most disturbing things about constitutional law in the last half century is the paucity of constitutional amendments.

Mike Rappaport

Professor of Law
University of San Diego School of Law

Mike Rappaport is Darling Foundation professor of law at the University of San Diego, where he also serves as director of the Center for the Study of Constitutional Originalism.

See more...

I believe that the constitutional amendment process is essential to originalism and to a desirable constitutional law. One of the most disturbing things about constitutional law in the last half century is the paucity of constitutional amendments. No constitutional amendment has been proposed and ratified since the 26th Amendment guaranteeing the right to vote to 18 year olds was enacted in 1971. (The 27th Amendment was proposed in 1789 and ratified over two centuries, receiving its last...

To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!

Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)

Already a subscriber?

Enewsletter Sign-up