This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...

Law Practice

Feb. 18, 2017

USDC one-two punch for the knockout

Consider a hypothetical where a defendant moves simultaneously using Rule 56 (no surprise) and Rule 12 of the federal rules. By Paul Rafferty

Paul F. Rafferty

Paul is recognized as one of the top 20 AI lawyers in California.

See more...

By Paul Rafferty

Bob, and his corporation Bobco, enter the boxing ring of jurisprudence suing Angel Inc. and various co-defendants. Bobco claims that its business was unlawfully gutted after its employees left to join a new business formed by co-defendants called NewCo. Bob claims that Angel is partially to blame and personally defrauded him. Bob and Bobco further sue Angel for alleged violations of California's Business and Professions Code Secti...

To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!

Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)

Already a subscriber?

Enewsletter Sign-up