This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...

Tax

Feb. 11, 2017

The many ways to interpret the emoluments clause

One legal scholar has identified several different meanings and usages of the term from the time of the Constitution.

Mike Rappaport

Professor of Law
University of San Diego School of Law

Mike Rappaport is Darling Foundation professor of law at the University of San Diego, where he also serves as director of the Center for the Study of Constitutional Originalism.

See more...

The foreign emoluments clause continues to receive attention in connection with President Donald Trump's decision to maintain some of his business assets. One question that arises is whether Trump's businesses might conflict with the clause if they engage in arms-length commercial transaction with a foreign government.

One reason to believe the clause would not cover the president is the argument of Seth Barrett Tillman, a lecturer at the Maynooth University Department of Law in Irel...

To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!

Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)

Already a subscriber?

Enewsletter Sign-up