Labor/Employment
Feb. 9, 2017
On worker rest-day issue, Nordstrom may have racked up victory
In interpreting an 1893 statute on what defines a work week, the state Supreme Court Tuesday looked inclined to agree with Nordstrom Inc. that its employees may work up to 12 consecutive days, and need not take a day off following six days of work.
Daily Journal Staff Writer
In interpreting an 1893 statute on what defines a work week, the state Supreme Court Tuesday looked inclined to agree with Nordstrom Inc.that its employees may work up to 12 consecutive days, and need not take a day off following six days of work.
"My reading is that the wage orders support your argument," said Chief Justice Tani Cantil-Sakauye to Nordstrom lawyer Julie A. Dunne, shareholder ...
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!
Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)
Already a subscriber?
Sign In