This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...

Perspective

Oct. 3, 2013

Like, that's protected speech

It doesn't take a law degree to know that "liking" any page or post communicates something. By David Greene


By David Greene


Very few social media users "liked" a federal district court decision last year that held that the act of "liking" a political candidate's Facebook page was not a "substantive statement" deserving of First Amendment protection. Bland v. Roberts, 857 F. Supp. 2d 599 (E.D. Va. 2012). The decision seemed obviously wrong to anyone who had ever used Facebook. It doesn't take a law degree to know that "l...

To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!

Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)

Already a subscriber?

Enewsletter Sign-up