This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...

Law Practice

Sep. 24, 2013

'Jewel' waivers a point of contention

Law firms are increasingly considering Jewel waivers in partner contracts, but established law firms can have it harder than their younger counterparts in going about implementing these waivers.


By Kylie Reynolds


Daily Journal Staff Writer


The longtime friends and partners who broke away from Allen Matkins Leck Gamble Mallory & Natsis LLP to form San Diego-based Crosbie Gliner Schiffman Southard & Swanson LLP in July spent months negotiating their partnership agreement.


Part of that discussion surrounded whether to include a so-called "Jewel" waiver - named after a 1984 ruling in Jewel v. Boxer - which, in th...

To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!

Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)

Already a subscriber?

Enewsletter Sign-up