This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...

Perspective

Oct. 28, 2009

Casting Doubt On Bivens Claims

Allan Ides of Loyola Law School says when it comes to civil rights, the Supreme Court tends to err on the side of the government power.

CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS

By Allan Ides

The Supreme Court's recent decision in Ashcroft v. Iqbal, 129 S.Ct. 1937 (2009), has generated substantial commentary over the Court's revision of federal pleading standards. The Court's new "plausibility" standard seems to be particularly exacting in the context of civil rights claims. Less attention has been paid, however, to the Iqbal Court's apparent antipathy toward civil rights claims generally. I...

To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!

Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)

Already a subscriber?

Enewsletter Sign-up