This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...

Health Care & Hospital Law

Oct. 27, 2009

Court Won't Restore 'Optional' Benefits

A federal appeals panel dealt the first setback to patient advocates, who seemed on a roll against California's sweeping health care cuts, when it declined to enjoin the state from cutting "optional" Medi-Cal services.

By Evan George

Daily Journal Staff Writer

A federal appeals panel dealt the first setback to patient advocates, who seemed on a roll against California's sweeping health care cuts.

The court chose not to restore "optional" health services like dental and chiropractic care, podiatry, and some mental health services, which lawmakers eliminated in July as part of a larger budget fix.

The cuts did not s...

To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!

Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)

Already a subscriber?

Enewsletter Sign-up