This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...

Perspective

Oct. 22, 2009

Summary Judgment Reconsidered

Kurt Schlichter of Schlichter & Shonack looks at Nazir v. United Airlines, Inc.'s take on the summary judgment motion process.

CIVIL PROCEDURE

By Kurt Schlichter

The 1st District Court of Appeal's ruling in Nazir v. United Airlines, Inc. et al. (2009 LEXIS 1659, Oct. 9th) highlighted many of the problems with summary judgment motion processes that civil litigation practitioners and the trial courts are only too well aware. The long opinion spares no one - not the defense, not plaintiff's counsel and not even the trial court - with a searing critique at ...

To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!

Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)

Already a subscriber?

Enewsletter Sign-up