This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...
This MCLE has expired.

Law Practice

Mar. 11, 2017

Attorney fees system is bad for us all

The issue has history: In Britain, the loser of a lawsuit pays the attorney fees of the winner. The "American rule," by contrast, is that absent a contractual provision, each side pays its own legal fees — win or lose. By Richard Schulman

Richard A. Schulman

Email: rschulman@hechtsolberg.com

Richard is an attorney in San Diego specializing in land use and municipal law.

See more...

By Richard Schulman

Law schools teach that the adversarial system is the best way to find the truth and reach justice. However, a tilted adversarial system accomplishes neither. Most of the public - and many attorneys - are not aware of the biggest tilt in our civil justice system: awarding only certain types of parties their attorney fees.

The issue has history: In Britain, the source of our common law tradition, the loser of a lawsuit pay...

To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!

Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)

Already a subscriber?

Enewsletter Sign-up