This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...
You have to be a subscriber to view this page.

Intellectual Property

May 7, 2013

Samsung argues against Apple-demanded smartphone sales ban

Attorneys with Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd. are defending a San Jose judge's decision to deny Apple Inc. a pivotal injunction, arguing that such sales bans are not appropriate if the infringing features do not drive consumer demand.


By Kevin Lee


Daily Journal Staff Writer


Attorneys with Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd. are defending a San Jose judge's decision to deny Apple Inc. a pivotal injunction, arguing that such sales bans are not appropriate if the infringing features do not drive consumer demand.


Kathleen M. Sullivan, a partner with Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan LLP, also said in a brief to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit that nearly all ...

To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!

Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)

Already a subscriber?

Enewsletter Sign-up